Board Thread:Staff announcements/@comment-24325645-20180922195131/@comment-24325645-20180925142630

In the midst of the current vote I have re-read over what Sabovia recently reported about me. He stated: "...on many occasions on Facebook attempted to be sexually explicit with me, describing his sexual proclivities in great detail, and he had on one occasion sent me explicit photos of himself, after which I blocked him. If you require proof of this, you can also speak to my boyfriend, who many of you know as Harry of Monovia (I also have more... concrete evidence, if needed). As you can see, this is a massive conflict of interest. User:Deutschlandkaiser's removal of me was not for the benefit of the wiki, but because of his own personal vendetta." I looked throughout our other conversations pertaining to this on the encyclopedia, and the message he so still has to reply to, as it was recommended to write. It seems to be that he continues to goes off the fact that "he's right" even though I clarified (clearly and not-so-clearly) at times that it seems we both were investigating one another then out of personal mistrust, which again has nothing to do with this wiki whatsoever, unless you actually were "snaking around" as I asked and you're doing this to just defame someone and cover your tracks from what I was investigating, and what you were saying, especially along the lines of if Harry wasn't around you'd do this and that, and again I had a girlfriend at the time, man, but as an investigator you say anything to get to the case of what you were trying to get to: what you believe about someone, and their reponses building up (unless that was part of your investigation). I told you the pictures were false and not of me (even though that should have been obvious, duh). Now, with that written, could these be the bases for defamation being committed under the pretense of libel? I know it is a published false statement because again, those were false words and pulled off internet images for the sake of investigation (and yet no one dares to defame the FBI or any other investigation agency or person when they do this), and the fact you said I sent one of myself, again, off the internet man, so no, not me whatsoever. That appears to be libel to me, turning someone's investigation into defamation all because they were trying to find out the truth, and then blatantly ignoring the well-written question I had toward you making it seem as if I was indeed right about the investigation then since you seeminly affirmed but are now denying the double-investigation I thought we were doing. I tried to touch bases with you two, and especially Harry as well, but our mutual friend Robert informed me that he said he made his decision, to which I asked: "That's what he said?" He replied: "Yeah he’s made his decision to fall out with you so to speak." So, whose really at fault here? I may be at fault for not simply trusting, but it appears to not be me whose the majority at fault.