Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830/@comment-5843134-20150219043520

Deutschlandkaiser wrote: Sabovia wrote: Rules of this consensus::Respect current policies, especially the personal attack policy.
 * If you are a new user, you may not vote
 * If you haven't properly edited for over 4 months (so, since September), you don't get a vote.
 * Back up your claims with evidence.
 * You may not vote for a blocked user. A blocked user's vote does not count, and you may only vote once.
 * You must have at-least 50 edits.

That is fair. I would like to call out contradictory to what was just removed from Bar's voting opinion! Bar is not a new user, he has properly edited, he edited 3 days ago and plans to edit more (just as soon as this is over). Also, he may have said support, but now he has to provide evidence all because he just simply supports the removal of you two guys? Oh well, that can be considered fair with the support evidence, however I am sure he may provide his own evidence. Now, he didn't vote for a blocked user and he has over 50 edits. The issue is not that's he is a new user (he isn't) the issue is that he hasn't made any real constructive edits since June of last year. I wouldn't have matter if he "Opposed", "Supported" or "Abstained".