Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-24553414-20140320025620/@comment-5843134-20140330100805

Sabovia wrote: UCS123 wrote: Unless your government is theocratic, which may be unfortunate for your citizens if you have any, either marriage should be given to all couples who claim to be married or to no couples. The UCS does not get involved in the regulation of relationships and does not bother to recognize any marriages.

You can choose to interpret the bible any way you want. There are some parts that even support slavery, abortion, etc. (but we won't go there). Long story short, I understand that you have a belief and you don't want to be hateful towards anyone; however the flipside is that if you really do the research and understand the origins of the bible itself (I have a deep knowledge of latin, Roman history, christianity, hellenistic culture, ancient religion etc.) then you will realize how dumb it truely is to be anti-marriage equallity. Simply because all of the logical arguments for hetero only marriages can be easily argued against. But there's no need to argue.

I think if you have a theocratic government and you don't recognize all marriages, you can still recognize the relationship between those other relationships and give those people equal benefits. And if your against that, your against human behavior itself. Of course christianity already goes against human behavior with celebacy lol. (just had to put my two-cents in)

Aizenhand wrote: If I 'really do the research'? I've done the research, thank you. God drew me to him at the age of 19 - there was no indoctrination and I will continue to trust him rather than the spiritless presuppositions of men. I wish you all the best. Don't go there, either of you.