MicroNations Fandom:Featured Article/Nominate

Here you may nominate the Featured Articles. Nominations would be voted upon and after that as per consensus featured articles would be selected. Please see the Featured Article Page.

Current Nominations
Please put constructive opinions, not personal attacks or biased opinions.

Harshvardhan
Article name: Harshvardhan

Nominated by: User:Rajputistan

Support

 * Rajputistan (talk) 17:28, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose
19:29, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I'm in opposition. The page is rather messy and it does not use the correct template.  M O N O V I A   My Message Wall ☭ User
 * OPPOSE, couldn't say more than Harry.--- LurkSAR (Talk) - (Contributions) 15:55, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Aryavart
Article name: Aryavart Empire

Nominated by: User:Rajputistan

Support

 * Rajputistan (talk) 17:28, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Supremeleaderofhasanistan 17:57, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Costadinos (talk) 18:19, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Fallschirmjäger (talk) 0:00 Begining of Time, 0BC (Pacific Maintime)

Oppose
19:30, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * The Page is quite short and there are quite a few red links. It's not a bad quality article, but it's not quite on Featured Article terms.  M O N O V I A   My Message Wall ☭ User

Scoussia
Article name:The Constitutional Monarchy of Scoussia

Nominated by:User:KingofCMS778

Support

 * User:KingofCMS778 1:17 Feburary 17, 2013
 * User:Supremeleaderofhasanistan Feburary 17, 2013

Oppose
15:37, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Wait, people are just using this now for self-promotion. I'm sorry, but none of you have even given a reason for this nomination. Nothing agaisnt your nation, but this definately does not qualify. For a start it does not even use the correct infobox. MicroWiki is not a strawpoll, it's not about the number of votes it is about the quality of the points put forward.  M O N O V I A   My Message Wall ☭ User
 * I'm sorry but this page needs to be somehow improved. Costadinos (talk) 15:44, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Wyhzette
Article Name: Wyhzette

Nominated by: User:Kranton54

Reason: I just think my article is decent quality, and it should set the standard. I don't want to advertise; people can find my article easily enough. Oppose as you please, but it doesn't really matter unless you have a really good reason.

Support

 * Support User:Supremeleaderofhasanistan Febuary 17,2013
 * Weak Support - Still need to improve your page. --User:Costadinos  of ΛKHΛRNES † My Message Wall 23:24, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 *  Strong Support - He is a good and honest guy and has a good page (no kid)  User: Democraking Miggy B.

Oppose
Oppose Silly and immature vandal pics plus red links. SpanionteGov ( talk ) 15:54, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose When will this stop?  M O N O V I A   My Message Wall ☭ User 16:57, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Grunkia
Article Name:Grunkia

Nominated by: User:GrunkiaGovernment

Reason: Just wanted to show the people here what the page standard should be. You're allowed to oppose, but I'm not advertising. I will also fix the red links very soon, so sit tight!

Support

 * Hoping that the red links will be removed soon. --User:Costadinos  of ΛKHΛRNES † My Message Wall 10:40, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Akharnes
Article Name: Akharnes

Nominated by: User:Supremeleaderofhasanistan

Reason: This article is probably one of the best on this wiki. It is still under construction and there are lots of red links, but it is probably one of the best articles on this wiki plus this is the first article nominated by someone else other than the articles maker.

Support

 * Ultimate Support User:Supremeleaderofhasanistan Febuary 20,2013
 * Ultimate Support User:Costadinos  of ΛKHΛRNES † My Message Wall 11:32, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * GrunkiaGovernment (talk) 23:32, February 20, 2013 (UTC)