Thread:Emperorunironia/@comment-6452219-20130531013417/@comment-5942519-20130827204058

DrukeTheFluke wrote: There is already a pope, Francis I. I don't see why micronational Catholics need to be different to non-micronational Catholics. Apart from being involved in our own declared countries of governments, we're normal people with normal lives (well, me atleast) so we don't need our own smaller version of everything, just follow and use what's already there. Now that I hear this, I must agree. There isn't much differentiation. Micronational Catholics aren't different from macronational ones. One silly idea is this:http://micronations.wikia.com/wiki/Micronational_Institute_of_Standardization/MIS_1. This page thinks that micronations have different time areas, just because micronations are, well, smaller. I agree with what DrukeThe Fluke has to say, and now, I must withdraw my support for the micronational papacy. However, users who have previously commented things like "this is silly", and "they're only doing this for publicity" are a bit accusatory. Just because you don't agree with what somebody says doesn't mean you should brand them and attack their ideas. Because you might not realise it, but people put time into these things, and this is what they think and believe. i thought Grunkia's comment about "only doing it for publicity" is not relevant to this case, however it certainly is through for other cases.