Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830/@comment-5843134-20150219232625

Deutschlandkaiser wrote: Sabovia wrote:

Deutschlandkaiser wrote:

Sabovia wrote:

Deutschlandkaiser wrote:

Sabovia wrote:

Deutschlandkaiser wrote:

Sabovia wrote: I obviously oppose - Although I apologize if you feel I've abused my powers. I've been having a horrible personal life lately, but that does not excuse my supposed actions.

May I simply request, that we put this vote on hold until after Alex and I have finished the changes to MicroWiki, I feel it would be unfair to decide this until you've seen the MicroWiki we're trying to build, which should be here in the next few days.

The reason I deleted the vote was because it was (at the time) against policy, so, technically, I was not abusing my rights, simply obeying policy. I did, a few days ago, actually, check with numerous "higher-ups" to see if the "users cannot create consensuses" rule was breaching any of Wikias policies, and the answer I got was "No". I might also need to add that the former policy in question, was voted upon by the previous admin team that I was apart of, namely, User:Soika, User:Eastest566, User:LurkSAR and, of course, me. I did not decide it on my own.

Ultimately, however, I shall remove my administration rights if the community demands it.

EDIT: The users I contacted, were User:Jr Mime and User:sactage, the latter was formally a Wikia Staff member. Also, I should note, I deleted your friends vote because he/she literally just joined MicroWiki. It wouldn't have mattered what his vote was, "Support", "Oppose" or "Abstain". I feel administrators shouldn't be able to vote for themselves on the matter, just the non administration. For in these cases, administrators need not apply [in voting for themselves here]. No, we are active members of the community, we get a vote too. Wouldn't that be unfair, for administrators voting to keep themselves in power can seem very biased.. From my understanding, you've already made plans to what will happen in the case the community decides to remove Alex and I, and you've already assumed the admin role, so you're voting for yourself. So, no I wouldn't say that is a valid reason. No. Actually those so called made plans are of Cinder's talk. We all haven't even sought of a final plan. And this is not even voting for myself, this forum thread (of that which I am sure of), is voting about you and Alex. I apologize, I heard otherwise. But no, admins get to vote in this situation. That would tend to seem as interfering. Interring with what?