Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830/@comment-5843134-20150225220227

Connor Michael wrote: POTROK wrote: Connor Michael wrote: WaterCorn wrote: Connor Michael wrote: I agree with POTROK on this one. I have had many bad experiences with Sabovia. He deleted my stuff for no reason, same with my friends. If there was a valid reason, he would not tell us. I have gone so far as to create something else for micronations, so that I could create things in peace.

I have nothing against LurkSAR, because I have never had any matters with him, however, seeing how corrupt this wiki is, I would not be surprised if he has abused his power as well.

All Sabovia does is delete stuff, just look at his history! Although I believe he deletes that too, so you can't see it.

Anyways, this wiki, I belive, would be better without them.

And no personal attacks were meant in this message, blah, blah, blah, etc. Seeing as you're only a recently signed-up member, I'm unsure of how you're able to have so many 'bad run-ins' with Sabovia here, unless you're simply a sockpuppet account which is evading a ban or block.

Onto my main point though; it would be great if you could provide some precise pieces of evidence to how Sabovia has deleted you and your friends' pages 'without reason', because that is a claim I highly doubt, seeing as the reasoning for deletion is placed at the top of the pages prior to it being removed from the wiki.

Furthermore, I love to see an explanation on how this site's administration team is 'corrupt', particularly as there are very few incentives for moderators to actually be underhanded with the wiki.

I've already stated my position on the fourth voting thread, so I won't vote again here; but all I'll say is that whilst I feel both LurkSAR and Sabovia shouldn't be the only two administrators on the site, and that some of the current policies are far to restrictive, I also feel that they've been doing a great job in restructuring and looking after the wiki in the absence of some of the older administrators. I cannot provide specific evidence. You know why? Because Sabovia deletes his deletion logs. Also, this is my second account, yes, because I was blocked before for having the same IP address as someone else who was banned.

And, it makes me laugh how much everyone is up about the rules, everyone on this wiki seems arrogant. Like seriously people, loosen up and ''get a life. It's a  MICRONATION '', cool down. You're all so stiff.

And Sabovia, it wasn't a FALSE ACCUSATION, it was true, you just drowning too much in your own arrogance to realise that I am telling the truth.

Also, no personal attacks, false accusations, or other crap you turds come up with was meant in this post, etc, etc. Great response, Connor. The admins feel the need to have absolute control over a website that has no effect in real life. It's a website, people. Jeez. Quit banning people because they're taking advantage of the US Constitution. As I am currently in the United States of America, I take those laws and follow them. I don't care what country's laws you all follow, but mine grant me free speech. Banning me because of some opinion I express or some words I say is not okay. At least you could try not being so short with people.

Go ahead, ban me, digital dictators! I'm so scared of being blocked on a website. Sabovia has me quaking in my boots! NICE speech POTROK, you displayed my reasons perfectly.

Sabovia is a no good, stuck up, scruffy looking, nerf herder Dick-tatorial nazi!

no personal attacks were meant in this message Thank you for that, it means a lot. Obviously, that is a personal attack, regardless of "no personal attacks were meant in this message", although due to it being in cursive, I feel it was meant as sarcasm, also. They say talking to yourself is the first sign of insanity.

Secondly, you can't delete deletion logs, it's literally impossible, as there would be deletion logs of me deleting said deletion logs.

Thirdly, the "Freedom of Speech" law does not apply on the internet, ask Wikia. Websites have the right to enforce rules, which may limit people's speech, such as banning personal attacks.

- Sabovia ☎ | ✍ 22:02, February 25, 2015 (UTC)