Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830/@comment-25872937-20150220044603

This vote is extremely difficult for me, provided that Sabovia hasn't really done anything in particular against me or my pages. I have nothing but respect for the admin team. However, I have seen the other claims from this post and other actions regarding this issue, I have to take their claims into consideration.

The main problem I have is rules such as the "personal attack policy" are somewhat vague (despite the various provisions) so that some might have a different interpretation of the rules than others. Currently I believe, in this thread and others, that the admins have taken a different, much stricter interpretation of all the rules than what appears to me as the majority of the community's interpretations. It appears that the admins have begun to use this as a silencing tool for things they don't like. I know that there are specific provisions in the rule (the dictatorial remark), and I realize that this rule is open to various forms of interpretation, but like I said before, the admin views are different from the community's views.

I understand that a strict code is needed in order to enforce the quality of the wiki, which I commend the staff for attempting. However, I believe that these attempts have gone too far in some areas, and of course there are other allegations of abuse that, while I cannot speak for them, I am aware of. The removal of the original vote makes me wary, despite previous policy.

While this vote is a conflicting issue for me, I still believe that the purpose of an administrative system or government is to uphold the views of the people. I must agree with Potato3030 on this issue. I do believe that should the vote be opposed, there are other solutions, and I hold no grudges against the aforementioned admins. However, I also believe that the admins have the responsibility of taking the opinions of the community into consideration, something which, based upon certain removals I have seen, has not, in my opinion, been done to its fullest extent. Therefore, with the utmost respect I can possibly offer, I must enter a vote of support.