Thread:Grémmian/@comment-4899162-20131125183926/@comment-4899162-20131125204907

Grémmian wrote: So, for example, if it has no links at all, has no revisions within the past year or year and a half, is fictional, a redlink savior as described above, or its just extremely ugly and shows no signs of being improved, it should be removed from the wiki. Like this. Look at the article in question, and its history. If you've never heard of it before, sounds unserious, both in nature and article, and is ~1 year old, it should be ready to be purged.