Thread:Brandon Rhea/@comment-1878162-20130202053555/@comment-20644-20130205222603

Let's please drop the discussion about Rajputistan now. It's not relevant to this conversation.

Rajputistan wrote:

@Brandon Rhea: I wouldn't have any objection, but it would be better if you post admin nomination criteria and we discuss it in fresh new thread. :D

Also, you decide... Would it be good to keep current admin team in same position or full election? Community really don't 'love' current team completely. But you have much more exprienced and hope you would bring up with best thing :) Oh agreed, it would absolutely be in a different place than this. I'd post a blog rather than expect people to gravitate to what already is a long discussion here.

Most of the criteria discussion will be about soliciting people's thoughts on what the criteria should be. Using that feedback, I can then construct proper criteria at the end of it and, when ready, post the election.

I also think it would be best to keep the current team in place. The key thing to avoid in this process is drama. It's not completely avoidable, and some people's feelings will always get hurt along the way, but we can lessen it as much as possible. A vote about removing people is an invitation to a drama explosion. The wiki doesn't need that kind of headache right now.