Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830/@comment-5843134-20150223072950

It just occurred to me, you guys haven't cited any valid evidence that I, or LurkSAR abused our powers, and the only evidence you did cite was me obeying policy or making policy clearer.

I said a long time ago that we don't remove admins because the community "doesn't like them", we only remove them if they've broken policy. And the reasoning against me is basically, put in simple, terms, "I don't like you" or "Users don't have a day", the latter is strictly untrue, users have always had the ability to voice their opinions, and we've let users decide what policies to add in the past.

And it's funny that the people who oppose are people who I've blocked in the past, or are friends of Kaiser (someone who has already decided that he is head admin on Skype). The latter thinks if their friend is "head admin" they will have a chance at becoming an administrator. Which really shows what the problem is, it's not my so-called "admin abuse", but the community's behaviour and maturity level.

Now, admin abuse is "someone abusing their powers, such as breaking policy". My overall personality has nothing to do with my user-rights, if that's what you don't like.