Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830/@comment-24325645-20150219031739

FosterIslandRepublic wrote: So, I'm going to start by saying I'm a supporter of Sabovia and the admin team.

It has come to my attention that the people who wish to remove our admins from power are new users and don't know the alternatives..

I came to this wiki in a time of transition. There was a "totalitarian" admin that banned and kicked as he pleased. There didn't have to be any reason. After a while, Andrew took power and has really changed things for the better.

Andrew is only doing what he must to make our wiki a respectable one. If you do not think so, you're free to move your articles.

This wikia is better than its been in a long time, I'm saying that from the bottom of my heart.

So not only will I say that these threads break microwiki policy, but, I would like to publicly thank Andrew and his team for all they've done for our wiki.

So no, we should not remove our admins. They are doing their job as best as they can. They're undermanned and they've not got a whole lot of quality users that qualify for the job.

Thank you for your time,

FosterIslandRepublic (talk) Hello there,

It is not ultimately just new users who wish to have these people removed (as noticed from several MicroWiki skype chat rooms). Now, I have been here since 2012, and well I've seen a lot of stuff go around on MicroWiki. I know exactly the admin you are talking about as well. By the way, Andrew did not take power after that administrator, Sebastian Schriber did (and thus all credit is due to him, to which then Sabovia came after Seb left). Now, the wiki itself may seem stable, however I would like to say in recent episodes the administration have been abusing their powers with the adding of information to policies after users are banned (as if they just made them up). So, I feel we should remove if (notice the emphasis on the if) they do such a thing again, so I am going to have support.