Board Thread:MicroWiki/@comment-25866192-20150219002830

Salutations,

Some of you may or may not know, but there was an attempted vote to remove the administrators Sabovia and LurkSAR from power. After hearing arguments against the administrators (especially about the former) I honestly was still undecided, and did not immediately vote. Pondering various allegations of abuses of power, I finally came to the conclusion to put in my vote of “Support” to the motion, but to my surprise, Sabovia had deleted the discussion. If a leader is being accused of corruption, whether true or not, it makes no difference: Deleting the accusations is itself a tell-tale sign of corruption. He says that he didn't realize deleting the vote was a breach of Wikia's policy, which it was, seeing as a staff member has now deleted the clause from MicroWiki's policy that allowed him to do so, but I question why Sabovia was deleting the vote in the first place.

Before I go on, let me add that this should not be misconstrued as a personal attack, as I hardly know any of you guys, and that I am just bearing witness to the misconduct which I have seen.

I believe Sabovia has, on multiple occasions, abused his power, and that LurkSAR has likely been complicit in such actions, the specifics of both of which can be better summarized by other users. Thus, multiple other users and I believe it in the best interests of the Wiki to remove the admin rights of the two current administrators, and that doing so would result in the “fresh start” they have been championing but not earnestly attempting.

Staff members from Wikia have been contacted, and they fully approve of any votes such as this.

Please reply with a vote of “Support” if you're in favor of Sabovia and LurkSAR's removal, or “Oppose” if you're against the motion.  