Board Thread:Legislation/@comment-5843134-20150327185832/@comment-24325645-20150327212046

ThomasMontgomery wrote: As for the swear words, if they arent allowed there needs to be a limit. Hell isn't a swear word, it's a place that most religious people believe in, so if somebody were to put "What the hell" it would basically be the same as "What the Heck" or "What in gods name" or whatever. At least I was taught that way in Ireland.

I think the chat would open up alot of activity in the wiki and also increase ability to communicate with users. You would probably need to hire 3-4 chat admins that, with all of them combined they cover near 24-hour period, so the chat is always monitored.

As for the advised level of user behaviour, I'd straight up say no immaturity. I am not a perfectionist or anything, but I freak out when theres an immature kid on the internet using no grammar or common sense, and starts talking about Your Mom jokes or privates.

The wiki, if you want more people to come in, needs to have plenty of rules, but not too many to where every page has to be "Perfect" or its removed or something like that. So make a set of starter rules, then allow users and admins to make amendments and then vote on it (thats just my republican self speaking, power to the people) These opinions seem pretty straight-forward, however we have to remember MicroWiki is not a country, but an online encyclopedia; therefore there are no actions based on "this is a democracy" or "this is a republic", however we are to remember our contributors opinions are to be read.