Board Thread:Admin Announcements/@comment-5843134-20141029153251/@comment-24485780-20141030232651

Techiastronamo wrote: Soika wrote: Techiastronamo wrote: Oppose

While he may be innactive at most times, it doesn't mean that he can't just be removed. He is still a member of our community, and thus I would oppose his removal. He's a bureaucrat who hasn't been online for a year, he isn't "exiled from the community" just because we remove him from his position. I think you've interpreted it wrong, we just want to remove him from his bureaucrat position. Ah yes, I misinterpreted it. I still oppose, as for when he may go online, it is very likely that he'd want to perhaps enforce some rules around here or such. I'd give it 1 more month, if he has not had any activity in that time, I'd support it. But for now until that happens, I oppose. You still don't understand. He resigned. He will not want to enforce any rules, because he doesn't want the job.